Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP Crl. No. 182 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN WP Crl. No. 182 of 2026 and WPMP.Crl.No.182 of 2026
1. K. Mani S/o.Kolanthagoundar, D.No.78A, Kumarapalayam, Mohanur Taluk, Namakkal district. 2. V.Navaladi, S/o.Veerappa Goundar, D.No.5/38, Ayyampalayam, Kumarapalayam, Mohanur taluk, Namakkal District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The Superintendent of Police, Namakkal, Namakkal District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Mohanur Police station, Namakkal District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition (Criminal) filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue an order or direction in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the respondents herein to provide adequate police protection for fencing the petitioners land comprised in S.No.30/4A, Kumarapalayam Village, Mohanur Taluk, Namakkal district by considering the Petitioners representation dated
17.11.2025. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 182 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Senthil For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar, Counsel for Government of Tamilnadu (Crl.Side) for R1 and R2 ORDER The prayer sought for in this Writ Petition is to directing the respondents herein to provide adequate police protection for fencing the petitioners land comprised in S.No.30/4A, Kumarapalayam Village, Mohanur Taluk, Namakkal district by considering the Petitioners representation dated 17.11.2025. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents on getting instructions submits that on receipt of the complaint dated 17.11.2025, the second respondent has conducted the enquiry and the same was closed. 3. However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had obtained Judgment and Decree passed by the learned Principle District Judge, Namakkal in OS.No.279 of 2021 dated 05.10.2023 in respect of the subject property as against the counter party. Even then, the counter party was still disturbing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property and obstructing the petitioner for putting up the fence in and around the petitioner’s property. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 182 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5
4.
In view of the above, the petitioner is at liberty to lodge fresh complaint before the second respondent and on receipt of the same, the second respondent is directed to conduct an enquiry after issuance of the notice to the petitioner as well as the counter party and to pass orders in the light of the civil court decree obtained by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of the complaint. 5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition (Criminal) stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 15-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Vv To. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Namakkal, Namakkal District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Mohanur Police station, Namakkal District. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 182 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. Vv WP Crl. No. 182 of 2026 15-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 182 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis