Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 51334 (MAD)

Kumar v. K.Rajamanickam

CMP/12299/2026 · 2026-07-17

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.07.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN CMP No.12299 of 2026 and WA SR No.52251 of 2026 1. Kumar Meyyan Street, Agraharam Village, Koneripatti, Sankagiri Taluk, Salem District. 2. Senthil Meyyan Street, Agraharam Village, Koneripatti, Sankagiri Taluk, Salem District. 3. Kandasamy Meyyan Street, Agraharam Village, Koneripatti, Sankagiri Taluk, Salem District. 4. Nallasamy Meyyan Street, Agraharam Village, Koneripatti, Sankagiri Taluk, Salem District. Petitioners Vs 1. K.Rajamanickam Ellamadai, Vettuvappatti, Vellarivelli Village, Edappadi Taluk, Salem District. 2.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Salem District 3.The Taluk Surveyor, Edappadi Taluk, Salem District 4.The Inspector of Police Poolampatti Police Station Salem District. Respondents https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Petition filed to condone the delay of 66 days in filing the Writ Appeal against the order dated 17.12.2025 passed in W.P.No.49454 of 2025. For Appellants Mr. P.Jagadeesan For Respondents Ms. S.Devadarshini for Mrs. R.Hemalatha for R1. ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent. 2. This petition is filed for condonation of delay of 66 days in filing the appeal. 3. Taking into consideration the short period of delay and the cause shown, we are inclined to condone the delay. 4. The petition stands allowed. 5. Registry shall number the appeal and post for admission. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.) 17.07.2026 TAR https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis