Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 51318 (KAR)

SMT. ARSHIYA SIDDEEQUA v. MR. HASHIM YUSUF SAIT

COMAP/573/2024 · 2026-01-22

C M Poonacha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3618-DB COMAP No. 573 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 573 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ARSHIYA SIDDEEQUA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY OF M/S M V GROUP HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.83/10/11/14 1ST MAIN ROAD, J C ROAD KPN NEW EXTENSION BENGALURU - 560 002 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. S SHAKER SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. HASHIM YUSUF SAIT S/O LATE MOHAMMED YOUSUFF SAIT AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS R/AT NO.23, ANNASWAMY MUDALIAR ROAD ULSOOR, BENGALURU-560 042 2. M/S J M ASSOCIATES A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.3/1, LANGFORD ROAD/ LANGFORD GARDEN, WARD NO.76 RICHMOND TOWN, BENGALURU-560 025 REPRESENTED BY MR MOHAMMED MERAJ, ULSOOR, BENGALURU-560 042 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SHRISTI WIDGE, ADVOCATE FOR SRI MANU PRABHAKAR KULKARNI, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by AMBIKA H B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3618-DB COMAP No. 573 of 2024 THIS COMAP/COMMERCIAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.13(1- A) OF COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015 R/W SECTION 37 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LXXXIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE IN COM.A.A. NO.47/2024 DATED 03.07.2024. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. None appears for the appellant. The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo, inter alia, stating that the order impugned in the present appeal is only valid for a period of ninety days which has since elapsed, the appellant prays that the court be pleased to dismiss the appeal. 2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE AHB, List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6