Murugadass v. The State of Tamilnadu Rep by The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/18668/2026 · 2026-07-16
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 51317 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 51317 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.18668 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 16.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.18668 of 2026 Murugadass ... Petitioner Vs. The State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, G-5, Chunambedu Police Station, Chengalpattu District. (Crime No.52 of 2026) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.52 of 2026 on the file of respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Anbazhagan For Respondent : Mr.N.Palanivel, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 126(2), 324(4), 118(1), 351(2) of BNS r/w Section 4 of TNPHW Act, in Crime No.52 of 2026, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.18668 of 2026
2. The case of the prosecution is that, owing to a pending civil dispute, the petitioner criminally trespassed into the de-facto complainant’s house and damaged the CCTV camera installed therein. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution, and that he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that no one was injured. Hence, he prayed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police opposed the grant of anticipatory bail and submitted that the petitioner has one previous case. 5. Taking into consideration the totality of the circumstances, including the fact that the occurrence took place on 31.05.2026 and that the age of the petitioner is 60 years, this Court is of the firm view that, at this length of time, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. Hence, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail, subject to certain conditions: 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.18668 of 2026
6.
Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Cheyyur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions: (a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled; (b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity; (c) The petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks; (d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.18668 of 2026 actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; (e) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 16.07.2026 cda 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.18668 of 2026 To 1.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Cheyyur. 2.The Inspector of Police, G-5, Chunambedu Police Station, Chengalpattu District. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.18668 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. cda Crl.O.P.No.18668 of 2026 16.07.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis