Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 51315 (MAD)

BALAMURUGAN v. The Superintendent of Police

WP Crl./205/2026 · 2026-07-15

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Writ Petition (Criminal)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP Crl. No. 205 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN WP Crl. No. 205 of 2026 Balamurugan S/o.Marisamy, Residing at No.1121/7, Naveen Richland, Nerupperichal, Perumanallur, Tiruppur District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police Tiruppur District, Tiruppur. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Avinashi Sub-Division, Tiruppur District. 3. The Inspector of Police Perumanallur Police Station, Perumanallur, Tiruppur. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition (Criminal) filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.02/SDO-A/Mike Permission/2026 dated 19.01.2026 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to grant permission to the petitioner to conduct a peaceful protest with mike and sound system at Perumanallur Four Road any other date as fixed by the respondents based on the petitioners representation dated 13.01.2026 pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 205 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Ms.A.Jagadeeswari For Respondent(s): R.Ganesh Kumar, Counsel for Government of Tamilnadu (Crl.Side) for R1 to R3 ORDER The prayer sought for in this Writ Petition is direct to call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.02/SDO-A/Mike Permission/2026 dated 19.01.2026 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to grant permission to the petitioner to conduct a peaceful protest with mike and sound system at Perumanallur Four Road any other date as fixed by the respondents based on the petitioners representation dated 13.01.2026. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) has confirmed the same. 4. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on records. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 205 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, the petitioner is at liberty to lodge a fresh complaint on fresh cause of action. No costs. 15-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VV To 1. The Superintendent of Police Tiruppur Distict, Tiruppur. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Avinashi Sub-Division, Tiruppur District. 3. The Inspector of Police Perumanallur Police Station, Perumanallur, Tiruppur. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 205 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. VV WP Crl. No. 205 of 2026 15-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis