Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 51275 (KAR)

SRI.SANNA VEERAPPA v. NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA

MFA/8593/2024 · 2026-01-30

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5373 MFA No. 8593 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8593 OF 2024 (AA) BETWEEN: SRI. SANNA VEERAPPA S/O KRISHNAPPA AGD ABOUT 49 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O BANGARAKKANAGUDDA VILLAGE JAGALUR TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT …APPELLANT (BY SRI. MALLIKARJUNA G. CONTRACTOR, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER (TECH.) AND PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT NATIONAL HIGHWAY NO.48 BEHIND J.M.I.T., P.B.ROAD, CHITRADURGA, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER NATIONAL HIGHWAY NO.48, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, P.G.BUILDING, NEAR KSRTC DEPOT, CHITRADURGA CHITRADURGA DISTRICT Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5373 MFA No. 8593 of 2024 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ARBITRATOR FOR NHAI, DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, HARIHAR-DAVANAGERE ROAD, DAVANAGERE, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 37 (1)(c) OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 2. The appeal is listed today for orders regarding dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance of the office objection. A perusal of the daily order sheet reflects that the appeal was listed on 13.10.2015 and two weeks time was granted to comply with office objection. It was also ordered that if the office objections are not complied with within two weeks, the matter will be listed for dismissal. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5373 MFA No. 8593 of 2024 Accordingly, the Registry has listed the matter for dismissal of the appeal. 3. In view of the preemptory order and the appellant having not complied with the office objection, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11