Dashradh Ram Nutakki, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/18772/2026 · 2026-07-12
Challa Gunaranjan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5127 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5127 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010346842026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 18772 of 2026 Bench Sr.No:-2 [3506]
Dashradh Ram Nutakki ...Petitioner v. The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...Respondent(s) ********** Advocate for Petitioner:
MR. SUBRAMANYAM DARABOINA Advocate(s) for Respondent(s):
GP FOR REVENUE, GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION; & MRS. S.PRANATHI, SC FOR APCRDA.
CORAM : SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 13th July 2026
ORDER: Present writ petition is filed seeking following relief:
“(a) to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ,
order or direction, calling for the records and quashing the impugned acquisition/planning proceedings Notification No.116/2026/CRDA (ADMIN), Venkatapalem, dated 18/05/2026, and further Notification 125/2026/CRDA (ADMIN), Mandadam, dated 18/05/2026, in so far as they relate to the Petitioner’s lands described in Schedule-A; (b) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ,
order or direction forbearing the Respondents from treating the Petitioner’s unvested private lands as available inventory for the Land Pooling Scheme and from carving, allocating or recognising any reconstituted plots over the same otherwise than by acquisition strictly in accordance with law;
2 CGR, J. W.P.No.18772 of 2026 (c) Declare that the deeming under Section 126 of the APCRDA Act, 2014, read with Rule 91 of the AP Capital City Land Pooling Scheme Formulation and Implementation Rules, 2015, cannot be invoked to treat the Petitioner’s lands as needed for a public purpose the said lands having never vested in APCRDA and never having been lawfully designated; (d) Declare that the power of compulsory acquisition cannot be exercised to retrospectively validate layouts plot allocations or planning assumptions made over unacquired private lands; and (e) to pass such other order or orders ….”
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in pursuance to impugned two Notifications of even dated 18.05.2026, issued under Section 11 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (for short, “the Act”), inasmuch as the petitioner’s properties situated in Survey No.266/2 of Venkatapalem Village, Thullur Mandal and Survey Nos.181-1, 182-1, 183-1 of Mandadam Village, Thullur Mandal, are sought to be acquired. Objections have been submitted on 26.05.2026 during Grama Sabha and later on 02.06.2026 before the 3rd respondent and that the said objections have not been considered so far and that the respondents are proceeding with acquisition proceedings. Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner would urge to direct the respondents to consider the objections raised by the petitioner before taking a final decision in issuing declaration under Section 19 of the Act.
3 CGR, J. W.P.No.18772 of 2026 He, therefore, submits that it would suffice to dispose of the writ petition with the above directions.
3. On instructions, Mrs.S.Pranathi, learned Standing Counsel for 2nd respondent – AP CRDA; and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents 3, 4 and 5, would submit that as per impugned Notifications, the time-frame for submitting objections is 60 days and now that since the objections of petitioner have already been received, the same would be considered strictly in accordance with the enquiry contemplated under Section 15 of the Act. That the respondents are in the process of undertaking such exercise and only, thereafter, the proceedings would be taken to next stage of issuance of final declaration, if any.
4. In view of the aforesaid statement, with the consent of all the learned counsels appearing on either side, the writ petition stands
disposed of directing the respondents to consider the objections of the petitioner, in particular, as submitted on 02.06.2026 in the process of enquiry as contemplated under Section 15 of the Act and pass appropriate speaking orders thereon. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN cs