CRL OP No. 17968 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 17968 of 2026 1. Ravisankar 2. Narasimalu @ Lella Narasimalu 3. Anburajan @ Anbu ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. State rep by The Sub Inspector of Police, M-8, Sathangadu Police Station, Redhills. 2. Karthick @ Dhayanandharaj ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to call for the records in C.C.No.201 of 2026 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate at Thiruvottiyur and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.B.Motcham For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran Government Advocate (Criminal Side) For R1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17968 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER This Criminal Original Petition seeks to quash C.C.No.201 of 2026 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottiyur for alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(2) of IPC, on the ground of compromise between the parties. The parties are present before the court and, on examination, stand by their compromise and do not want the case to proceed further. 2. The broad contours of the High Court's power to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. and Section 528 of the BNSS in respect of compromise of non-compoundable offences are laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh -Vs- State of Punjab and Another (2012 10 SCC 303) and other subsequent judgments. 3. The gist of facts leading to the instant case is that there was a funeral procession in respect of a person’s death. At that time, when near the place of the defacto complainant, there was an incident where the defacto complainant is said to have questioned all the accused. The accused are said to have abused the defacto complainant, attacked him and threatened him. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17968 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the parties have ironed out their differences. 5. Thus, it can be seen that this matter is a fit case for the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction to quash the case on compromise. 6. Accordingly, this Crl.O.P. No.17968 of 2026 stands allowed. The C.C.No.201 of 2026 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottiyur stands quashed. 10-07-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No jas To 1.The Sub Inspector of Police, M-8, Sathangadu Police Station, Redhills. 2.The learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottiyur. 2.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17968 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. jas CRL OP No. 17968 of 2026 10-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis