1 2026:CGHC:16497 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1579 of 2026 1 - M/s Gurukripa Constructions Krishna Complex Krishna Complex, Shop No.3, Dhimrapur Road, Near Chaitnya Nagar Complex, Raigarh, District- Raigarh C.G. 496001 Through Its Partners 2 - Shri Ankur Agrawal S/o Shri Ajay Agrawal Aged About 38 Years R/o House No. A-1, Chaitnya Nagar, Dhimrapur Road, Raigarh, District- Raigarh C.G. 496001 3 - Smt. Neetu Agrawal W/o Ankur Agrawal Aged About 36 Years R/o House No. A- 1, Chaitnya Nagar, Dhimrapur Road, Raigarh, District- Raigarh C.G. 496001 4 - Shri Ajay Agarawal S/o Shri Hari Agrawal Aged About 63 Years R/o House No. A- 1, Chaitnya Nagar, Dhimrapur Road, Raigarh, District- Raigarh C.G. 496001 5 - Smt. Pushpa Agrawal W/o Shri Ajay Agrawal Aged About 59 Years R/o House No. A-1, Chaitnya Nagar, Dhimrapur Road, Raigarh, District- Raigarh C.G. 496001 6 - M/s Chandrahasini Steel And Mines P Limited Chakradhar Nagar Near P H E Water Tank Raigarh, District- Raigarh (Cg) 496001, Through Its Director ... Petitioners versus 1 - Central Bank Of India Raigarh, Branch Handi Chowk, Raigarh, District- Raigarh C.G., 496001, Through Its Authorised Officer 2 - Central Bank Of India Regional Office, Dhanjal Complex, Ring Road, Namnakala, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja, Cg 497001, Through Its Authorized Officer 3 - State Of Chhattigarh Through- District Magistrate, Raigarh, District- Raigarh (Cg) 4 - The Tahsildar Raigarh, District- Raigarh (Cg) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title, as taken from CIS} For Petitioners : Mr. Ankit Singhal, Advocate. For Respondents No. 1 & 2 For Respondents No. 3 & 4 : : Mr. P.R. Patankar, Advocate. Mr. Amit Naik, Panel Lawyer 2 {Hon’ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi} Order on Board 09/04/2026 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appropriate application before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad (U.P.) 2. Counsel for the respondents have no objection to allow the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner. 3. On due consideration and the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, the prayer made by petitioner’s counsel is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. 5. Pending interlocutory application (s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Date: 2026.04.10 12:48:16 +0530