Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5123 (AP)

POSHAM SREEKANTH REDDY v. KONA SASIDHAR

CC/4418/2024 · 2026-07-14

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 15.07.2026 Date of uploading : .07.2026 APHC010528842024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.4418 of 2024 Between: 1. POSHAM SREEKANTH REDDY, S/O. P. LAKSHMAMMA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O KANALA VILLAGE, NANDYAL MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. KONA SASIDHAR, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SMT RAJAKUMARI GANIYA, WORKING AS A DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 3. SRI K SUDHAKAR REDDY, WORKING AS A DEPUTY DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, DHONE, KURNOOL DISTRICT, (AT PRESENT) PREVIOUSLY WORKED AS DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 4. SRI P JANARDHAN REDDY, WORKING AS A DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, NARFDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT, (AT PRESENT) 5. SRI B SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, WORKING AS A DEPUTY EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 6. SRI R JEEVAN KUMAR REDDY, WORKING AS A MANDAL EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, RAMASAMUDRAM MANDAL, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT. 7. SRI M JAGADEESHWARA REDDY, KANALA VILLAGE, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue the summons to the Respondents herein and punish the respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the order and deliberate disobedience to the Orders dated 15.07.2024 passed in W.P. No. 11898 of 2024 by on the file of this Hon'ble Court. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P B REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.4418 of 2024 ORDER:- For non-compliance of the order dated 15.07.2024 in W.P.No.11898 of 2024, the present Contempt Case is filed. This Court vide order dated 15.07.2024, directed to examine the representation and pass appropriate orders on issuing notice to the petitioner and communicate the decision to the petitioner. 2. The 4th respondent filed counter asserting that as directed by this Court, the respondents have issued speaking order to Sri Posham Sreekanth Reddy, who is the contempt petitioner, vide proceedings in Rc.No.1899-4/B5/2024 dated 29.12.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has not received the said order copy dated 29.12.2025 to challenge the same. 4. Hence, the respondents are directed to furnish copy of the order dated 29.12.2025 to the petitioner herein within a period of two (2) weeks from today. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the said speaking order dated 29.12.2025. 5. As the respondents have complied with the order, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 15.07.2026 siva Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-reportable Yes/No 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.4418 of 2024 15.07.2026 ssiivvaa