[2026:RJ-JP:7827] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 2466/2026 Kana S/o Shri Lala, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Satiya Ki Dhani, Rupangarh, Police Station Rupangarh, District Ajmer. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 18/02/2026 1. This second bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.142/2025 registered at Police Station Rupangarh, District Ajmer for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) 74 & 331(6) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the challan papers. 4. As per the contents of the FIR and so also the statements of the injured-Babita recorded by the Police under Section 180 BNSS, 2023, no specific overt act was assigned to the present accused- petitioner as regards causing any injury which has been opined to be dangerous to life. [2026:RJ-JP:7827] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2466/2026] 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner is in custody since 16.12.2025 and the Police after completion of investigation has already submitted charge-sheet in the matter. 6. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. 7. On perusal of the statements of the injured-Babita, it is revealed that there are allegations of giving beating to her by 4-5 persons including the present accused-petitioner but it has not been specifically stated that who has caused injury which is opined to be dangerous to life. 8. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that no specific overt act has been assigned to the present accused-petitioner as regards causing any injury which is opined to be dangerous to life, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 9. Accordingly, the second bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /3