Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 51190 (MAD)

M.ANJALI DEVI v. THE SECRETARY

WA/1149/2024 · 2026-07-09

N Senthilkumar, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:MHC:2868 WA No. 1149 of 2024 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR WA No. 1149 of 2024 M.Anjali Devi ..Appellant(s) Vs 1. The Secretary Government of Tamil Nadu, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 2. The Chief Educational Officer Office of the Chief Educational Officer, Thiruvannamalai District. 3. The Head Master Govt Boys HigherSecondary School, Vandavasi, Thiruvannamalai District. ..Respondent(s) To set aside the order passed by this Court in WP No. 23330 of 2023 dated 09.08.2023 and direct the Respondents to reinstate the Appellant into service in the post of Office Assistant and regularize the Appellants service in the existing or future vacancies with continuity of service with all other attendant, serviced and monetary benefits and pass such further or other orders. For Appellant(s): Mr.V.S.Jagadeesan for Mr.K.Gokulram For Respondent(s): Dr.R.Gouri Government Counsel https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:2868 WA No. 1149 of 2024 __________ Page2 of 4 JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The writ order dated 09.02.2026 passed in W.P.No.23330 of 2023 is under challenge in the present writ proceedings. 2. Writ Petitioner is the appellant before this Court. Writ Petitioner was engaged as the Office Assistant by the Head Master of Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Vandavasi, Thiruvannamalai District. She was terminated from service. Appellant made a representation seeking reinstatement along with regularization. Since, no action has been taken, writ petition came to be instituted. 3. The order under challenge in the writ petition has been passed by the Chief Educational Officer, Thiruvannamalai. On perusal of the order, it would show that said order was passed in pursuant to the representation submitted by appellant in a grievance redressal meeting. However, the fact remains that appellant was not appointed in accordance with the Service Rules and no appointment order has been issued by the Head Master. Educational Department has not appointed the appellant nor salary has been paid from the Government fund. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:2868 WA No. 1149 of 2024 __________ Page3 of 4 4. Considering all these aspects, this Court does not find any infirmity in the writ order made in WP No. 23330 of 2023 dated 09.08.2023 and the same is confirmed. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (N.S.,J.) 09-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GD To 1. The Secretary Government of Tamil Nadu, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 2. The Chief Educational Officer Office of the Chief Educational Officer, Thiruvannamalai District. 3. The Head Master Govt Boys HigherSecondary School, Vandavasi, Thiruvannamalai District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:2868 WA No. 1149 of 2024 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND N.SENTHILKUMAR, J. GD WA No. 1149 of 2024 09-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis