2026:JHHC:10353 --1-- A.B.A. No. 1526 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1526 of 2026 ---- 1. Kailash Yadav aged about 56 years. 2. Manoj Yadav aged about 55 years. Both Son of Nunu Yadav, resident of Village- Padirma, P.O. & P.S. – Barhi, Dist. Hazaribag. .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Shailendra Jit, Advocate For the State :- Ms. Sushma Aind, Advocate ---- 02/10.04.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Barhi P.S. Case No.287 of 2025 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 115 (2), 126(2), 127(2), 191(3), 303(2), 118(2), 109(1), 324(6), 352 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M. Hazaribag. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that on the date of the alleged occurrence, the brother of the informant, namely, Mahesh Yadav dashed the Splendor motorcycle being registration No. JH 02AT 9940 of the co-accused Arvind Yadav by his car and met with an accident and sustained injuries on his head and face and later on present case has been lodged on entirely 2026:JHHC:10353 --2-- A.B.A. No. 1526 of 2026 concocted allegations as there are previous enmity between the parties. He further submits that the informant’s side having a criminal antecedent and both are the villagers of same village and even they are neighbour. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations of assault are there. 5. On perusal of the FIR, it transpires that the said allegation is made against 10 to 12 persons and there are general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons. It has been pointed out that there is a land dispute between the parties and informant’s side having a criminal antecedent and it has further been pointed out that the said injuries have been received in the accident as noted in the argument of learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, however, that injury has been concocted upon the petitioners and others and in that view of the matter the petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioners on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 10.04.2026 Simran/