Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5117 (UTT)

SUDEEP v. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

WPCRL/1815/2025 · 2026-01-09

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:423-DB SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 09.01.2026 WPCRL No.1815 of 2025 Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. Hon ’ble Su bh ash Upadh yay , J. ( per : Hon ’ble Ju st ice Sr i Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i) Mr. R.C. Tamta and Ms. Shobha Mehra, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Nandan Arya, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. K.S. Bora, learned Deputy A.G. with Mr. J.P. Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. By means of this writ petition, petitioners have sought the following reliefs: - “(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.1 and 2 to provide adequate security to the petitioners as provided under the law by protecting their rights of life and personal liberty with dignity as guaranteed to them by the Constitution of India under Article 21, being a threat perception of life and liberty as against the respondent nos.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of respondent no.2 to comply with the direction issued by the respondent no.1 dated 06.12.2025 by which the respondent no.1 has directed the respondent no.2 to investigate and decide the complaint dated 06.12.2025 (Annexure No.1 to the writ petition) submitted by the petitioners.” 4. Learned State Counsel submits that there is some property dispute between petitioners and 2026:UHC:423-DB private respondents, therefore, they can approach a competent civil court for resolving such dispute. 5. This Court finds substance in the submission made by learned State Counsel. 6. Petitioners are property dealers and they enter into various transactions with different persons. If there is some dispute, arising out of such transactions, that cannot be resolved by writ court. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum. ( Subhash Upadhyay, J.) ( Man oj Kum ar Tiw ar i, J.) 09.01.2026 09.01.2026 Rajni RAJINI GUSAIN Digitally signed by RAJINI GUSAIN DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=97cfa6e4cbd49c07b876db 48448ac3701a9ae475a2547e4b7f1d 9b1f17d01342, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=8D039BC77BD1A222 2B4DF4FC80D4557562F95BEBA013 F530616A158A0A878BD8, cn=RAJINI GUSAIN Date: 2026.01.10 10:52:28 +05'30'