Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 51149 (KAR)

SMT AZEEMA KHATHOON v. BESCOM

WP/34680/2025 · 2026-01-29

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4944 WP No. 34680 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 34680 OF 2025 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN: SMT. AZEEMA KHATHOON W/O SANAVULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS RESIDING AT SEETHANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563130. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANTH KUMAR S.P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BESCOM K.R.CIRCLE, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-01 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF OFFICER 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BESCOM, MALUR DIVISION, MALUR, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT KARNATAKA - 563130. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CO AND M DIVISIONAL OFFICE, BESCOM, CHAMPION REEFS, KGF-563117. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H.V.DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4944 WP No. 34680 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Shanth Kumar.S.P., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.H.V.Devaraju., counsel for the respondents have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent - authorities to consider the representation dated:24.06.2025 vide Annexure-E. 3. Counsel Sri.H.V.Devaraju., on instructions submits that an appropriate order may be passed. 4. The oral submission made by counsel for the respondents is placed on record. 5. A mandamus is ordered directing the respondent - authorities to consider the representation - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4944 WP No. 34680 of 2025 dated:24.06.2025 vide Annexure-E in accordance with the law within four weeks from the certified copy of this order. 6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Needless to observe that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 64