- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1254 CRL.P No. 15472 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 15472 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SURESH NAIK @ SURESHA S/O LATE RAMANAYAKA AGED 54 YEARS, R/AT NO. 120, KERGALLI VILLAGE AT POST, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSORE - 570 026. 2. SIDDARAJAMMA W/O SURESH AGED 53 YEARS, R/AT NO. 10/30, 1ST CROSS, NEAR KAMALA CLINIC, BHEL MINI COLONY, T. DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 057. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH M.R, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BAGALAGUNTE P.S., BENGALURU, REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BENGALURU - 560 019. Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1254 CRL.P No. 15472 of 2025 2. SMT. SARASWATHI AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS W/O NOT KNOWN SUPERVISOR CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICE YELANDUR TALUK CHAMARAJANAGARA - 571 441. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ANOOPU KUMAR, HCGP FOR R1; R2 - SARASWATHI, SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN SPL.C.C.NO.1164/2025 REGISTERED FOR OFFENCE P/U/S 376 OF IPC AND SEC. 5(L), 6 OF POCSO ACT, 2012 AND SEC. 9 OF PROHIBITION OF CHILD MARRIAGE RESTRAINT ACT BY BAGALAGUNTE P.S BENGALURU, IN CR.NO.246/2024 AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER/ ACCUSED NO.2 AND 3 IS CONCERNED, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CC AND SJ, FTSC-II, BENGALURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER The caption petition is filed by accused nos.2 and 3, who are the parents of accused no.1, who was charge sheeted for the offence punishable under Section 376 of IPC and Sections 5(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1254 CRL.P No. 15472 of 2025 Section 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Restraint Act in C.C.No.1164/2025. 2. The present petition is instituted by the petitioners, who are none other than the parents of accused No.1. It is their categorical contention that they have been arrayed as accused solely on account of their familial relationship with the prime accused, without any independent or incriminating material attributed to them. The petitioners seek quashing of the proceedings primarily on the ground that the Special Court, after conducting a full-fledged trial, has acquitted accused No.1 of the offences punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, and Section 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has further brought to the notice of this Court that neither the victim nor the State has chosen to challenge or assail the said judgment of acquittal rendered - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1254 CRL.P No. 15472 of 2025 in Spl.C.C.No.1881/2024, and the same has thus attained finality. 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel for the State, and upon a careful perusal of the material placed on record, this Court has bestowed its anxious consideration to the judgment of acquittal passed by the Special Court in Spl.C.C.No.1881/2024. 4. It is not in dispute that the gist of the prosecution case was directed primarily against accused No.1, who was charged with grave offences under Section 376 of the IPC, Section 6 of the POCSO Act and Section 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. The Special Court, upon appreciation of oral and documentary evidence and after a full-fledged trial, has acquitted accused No.1 on merits. The petitioners herein, who are the parents of accused No.1, were charge-sheeted only in respect of the offence punishable under Section 9 of the Prohibition of Child - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1254 CRL.P No. 15472 of 2025 Marriage Act. Except for their relationship with accused No.1, there is no independent, substantive or incriminating material placed on record to prima facie establish their active involvement or culpability. 7. In the backdrop of the acquittal of the prime accused after a full-fledged trial, the continuation of criminal proceedings against the petitioners for the very same transaction and on the same set of allegations would be wholly unsustainable. Permitting the prosecution to proceed against the parents, when the foundation of the case against the principal accused has failed on merits, would amount to subjecting the petitioners to unnecessary harassment and would result in abuse of the process of law. More so, when no additional or incriminating material has been forthcoming despite the filing of the charge- sheet, the continuation of proceedings against the petitioners would serve no useful purpose. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1254 CRL.P No. 15472 of 2025 8. This Court is also mindful of the fact that if indulgence is declined at this stage, the petitioners, despite the acquittal of accused No.1, would be compelled to undergo the rigours and ordeal of a prolonged criminal trial, which would not only be oppressive but would also defeat the ends of justice. Such a course would clearly amount to misuse of the criminal process. 9. In these circumstances, this Court is of the considered opinion that this is a fit case for exercising the inherent jurisdiction vested in this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to prevent abuse of process and to secure the ends of justice. Accordingly, interference at this stage is warranted. 10. Accordingly, this Court passes the following: ORDER i. The criminal petition is allowed; - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1254 CRL.P No. 15472 of 2025 ii. The proceedings pending in Spl.C.C.No.1164/2025 on the file of Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, FTSC-II, Bengaluru, are hereby quashed. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3