Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5112 (AP)

The Kadapa District NGO's Cooperative House Building v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its

WP/4910/2012 · 2026-07-09

Kiranmayee Mandava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 10-07-2026 Date of uploading : 15-07-2026 APHC010047452012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 4910/2012 Between: 1. THE KADAPA DISTRICT NGO'S COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING, SOCIETY LTD, KADAPA REP BY ITS PRESIDENT M. VIJAYA BHASKAR REDDY ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND COOPERATION (VIII) DEPT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD 2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR COOPERATION AND REGISTRAR OF, COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA HYDERABAD 3. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT 4. SRI BANDARU GOPALA SWAMY EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT B. GOPAL SWAMY NGO'S COLONY, KADAPA ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue an appropriate writ order or direction more one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order/proceedings of the 2nd Respondent issued in Rc.No. 1376/2004-HSG.2, dt. 15.12.2005 and the order passed by 2 the 1st respondent-Government in Memo No. 281/CH(1)/06-2 dt. 9.5.2007 as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 6270 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the proceedings of the 2nd Respondent in Rc.No. 1376/2004-HSG.2, dt. 15.12.2005 pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PONNADA SREE VYAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION 2. DHEERA KANISHKA 3. A V S LAXMI The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- It has been stated by learned counsel for the respondents that the cause raised in the writ petition would not survive. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 10.07.2026 ANI Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ☑ 4 112 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO:4910 of 2012 Dated: 10.07.2026 ANI