Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 51114 (KAR)

SRI. K. NARAYANASWAMY v. CHIEF ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL)

WP/34151/2025 · 2026-01-07

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:728 WP No. 34151 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 34151 OF 2025 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN: SRI. K.NARAYANASWAMY S/O. KONDAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 12/1, NAGARABHAVI MAIN ROAD, S.V.G. NAGAR, MOODALAPALYA, BENGALURU - 560072. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.H.THIMMAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CHIEF ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL) BESCOM, NORTH DIVISION, BEEJA BHAVANA, HEBBAL, BENGALURU-560024. 2. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL) BESCOM, BENGALURU CIRCLE, NO.232, 5TH MAIN, 3RD CROSS, HRBR LAYOUT, NEXT TO BANASWADI POLICE STATION, KALYANANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560043. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL), BESCOM, SHIVAJINAGAR DIVISION, BENGALURU-560043 Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:728 WP No. 34151 of 2025 4. THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL), BESCOM, 5TH EAST DIVISION, LAZAR TOWN ROAD, COOKE TOWN, BENGALURU-560005. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. C.CHANNEGOWDA, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Thimmaiah K.H., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.C.Channegowda, counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4 appeared in person. 2. The writ petition is filed seeking mandamus directing respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the representations submitted by the petitioner dated 30.09.2025 and 13.10.2025 vide Annexures Q and R. 3. Sri.C.Channegowda, counsel submits that an appropriate order may be passed. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:728 WP No. 34151 of 2025 4. The petitioners grievance is that he has submitted the representations in 2025, however, the same are not considered as of today. Hence, this Court deems it proper to issue a mandamus directing respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the representations submitted by the petitioner dated 30.09.2025 and 13.10.2025 vide Annexures Q and R within a period of two months from the receipt of certified copy of this order. 5. Resultantly, the petition is disposed of. Sri.C.Channegowda, counsel submits that he would be filing vakalath for respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4. If the vakalath is filed, Registry to accept the same. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 80