ON THE DEATH OF RAJAN ALI, v. ON THE DEATH OF AJIJUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY,
I.A.(Civil)/1282/2026 · 2026-04-27
Robin Phukan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5111 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5111 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/5 GAHC010079912026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1282/2026 ON THE DEATH OF RAJAN ALI, HIS LEGAL HEIRS REPRESENTING 1.1: SUNABAN BIBI (WIFE) R/O- VILL.- ALGAPUR BAZAR P.O. KALIBAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788150. 1.2: JAMIRUDDIN (SON) R/O- VILL.- ALGAPUR BAZAR P.O. KALIBAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788150. 1.3: SAYANA BEGU @ BEDURA (DAUGHTER) R/O- VILL.- ALGAPUR BAZAR P.O. KALIBAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788150. 1.4: HAZIRA BEGUM (DAUGHTER) R/O- VILL.- ALGAPUR BAZAR P.O. KALIBAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788150. 1.5: NAZIRA BEGUM (DAUGHTER) R/O- VILL.- ALGAPUR BAZAR P.O. KALIBAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI
Page No.# 2/5 PIN- 788150. 1.6: MONOWARA BEGUM (DAUGHTER) R/O- VILL.- ALGAPUR BAZAR P.O. KALIBAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788150. 1.7: DILWARA BEGUM (DAUGHTER) R/O- VILL.- ALGAPUR BAZAR P.O. KALIBAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788150. 1.8: ABDUL HUSSAIN R/O- VILL.- ALGAPUR BAZAR P.O. KALIBAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788150. 1.9: JAHIRA BEGUM (DAUGHTER) R/O- VILL.- ALGAPUR BAZAR P.O. KALIBAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788150 VERSUS ON THE DEATH OF AJIJUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY, HHIS LEGEL HEIRS 1.1:REHATUN NESSA CHOUDHURY (WIFE) R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I P.O. CHANDIPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788150. 1.2:MASUK AHMED CHOUDHURY (SON) R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I P.O. CHANDIPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788150. Page No.# 3/5 1.3:MEHBUB AHMED CHOUDHURY (SON) R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I P.O. CHANDIPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788150. 1.4:JOBBER AHMED CHOUDHURY (SON) R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I P.O. CHANDIPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788150. 1.5:ASRAFUL BARI CHOUDHURY (SON) R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I P.O. CHANDIPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788150. 2:MOTIUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY S/O- LATE SIKANDAR ALI CHOUDHURY R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I P.O. CHANDIPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788150. 3:SAJJADUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY S/O- LATE SIKANDAR ALI CHOUDHURY C/O- MOTIUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I P.O. CHANDIPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788150. 4:ABDUL RAKIB CHOUDHURY S/O- LATE SIKANDAR ALI CHOUDHURY C/O- MOTIUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I P.O. CHANDIPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788150. 5:TAIBUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY S/O- LATE SIKANDAR ALI CHOUDHURY C/O- MOTIUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I P.O. CHANDIPUR
Page No.# 4/5 DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788150. 6:HAZIRA BIBI CHOUDHURY D/O- LATE SIKANDAR ALI CHOUDHURY C/O- MOTIUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I P.O. CHANDIPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788150. 7:KHADIZA BIBI CHOUDHURY D/O- LATE SIKANDAR ALI CHOUDHURY C/O- MOTIUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY R/O- VILL.- BHATIRKUPA PT-I P.O. CHANDIPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788150 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M H RAJBARBHUIYAN, MS. S RASUL Advocate for the Respondent : , MS F AHMED
BEFORE HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER 28.04.2026 Heard Mr. M.H. Rajbarbhuiyan, learned counsel for the applicants and also heard Ms. F. Ahmed, learned counsel for the opposite parties. This application under Order XLI Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure is preferred by the applicants for restoration of the RSA No.89/2019, which was dismissed for default vide order dated 19.03.2026. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that on account of his ill health, he could not remained present on 19.03.2026 and further, the matter was listed in the
Page No.# 5/5 supplementary cause list and the same escaped from his eyes and the cause of his absence has duly been explained in paragraph Nos.3, 4 and 5 of this application and therefore, he has contended to allow this application by restoring the RSA No.89/2019 in its original number and to fix the matter for hearing. The learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that she has no objection as the application is filed within the period of limitation and the matter may be listed for hearing. Accordingly, taking note of the submission of learned counsel for both the parties, this interlocutory application stands allowed. The RSA No.89/2019, which was dismissed for default vide order dated 19.03.2026, stands restored to file in its original number. Registry shall list the RSA No.89/2019 for hearing on 16.07.2026. Comparing Assistant Sd/- Robin Phukan JUDGE