HEDAYTULLAH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
WPC/7679/2025 · 2026-01-05
Sri Ananda Sen
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 511 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 511 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:12 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.7679 of 2025 ------ Hedaytullah, son of Ahmed Hussain, Village Harihara, P.O. Srikund, P.S. Barharwa, District Sahebganj. … … Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand, through its Chief Secretary, Project Bhawan, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi.
2. Regional Deputy Director of Education, P.O. & P.S. Dumka, District Dumka.
3. District Education Officer, Sahebganj, P.O. & P.S. Sahebganj, District Sahebganj.
4. District Project Officer, Sahebganj, P.O. & P.S. Sahebganj, District Sahebganj.
5. District Superintendent of Education, Sahebganj, P.O. & P.S. Sahebganj, District Sahebganj.
6. Block Education Extension Officer, Barharwa, P.O. & P.S. Barharwa, District Sahebganj.
7. Headmaster, Upgraded Middle School, Harihara, P.O. Harihara, P.S. Barharwa, District Sahebganj.
8. Md. Kamrul Haque, son of Late Ekramul Haque, resident of Village Harihara, P.O. Srikund, P.S. Barharwa, District Sahebganj. … … Respondents ------
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashim Kr. Sahani, Advocate
Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent(s): Ms. Deepika Jojowar, AC to SC-VI ------
02/ 05.01.2026
Heard learned counsel representing the petitioner and
learned counsel representing the respondents.
2.
In this writ petition, the petitioner has raised a grievance against appointment of respondent No.8 - Md. Kamrul Haque, as Para-Teacher in Upgraded Middle School, Harihara, District Sahebganj.
3.
It is the case of the petitioner that respondent No.8 has been appointed on the basis of some forged documents and against the Rules, thus the petitioner has filed this writ petition directing
2026:JHHC:12 2
respondent Nos.2 to 7 to hold an enquiry and pass an appropriate
order.
4.
Considering the nature of prayer made by the petitioner and the order which I intend to pass, it is not necessary to call for the counter affidavit by the respondents.
5.
Considering the grievance of the petitioner, I direct the petitioner to approach respondent No.5 – District Superintendent of Education, Sahebganj, who will look into the grievance of the petitioner and conduct an enquiry, after giving opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned and thereafter will pass an appropriate order considering the conclusion arrived at in the enquiry.
6.
The entire process should be concluded within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
7.
With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands
disposed of.
(ANANDA SEN, J.)
05th January, 2026 Prashant. Cp-2
Uploaded on 06.01.2026