- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2129 RSA No. 1755 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1755 OF 2024 (PAR) BETWEEN: SRI. M. N. BHAKTHA VATHSALA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, S/O. LATE M. NARASIMHA MURTHY, R./AT NO. 417/1, DEVAMBA AGRAHARA, K.R. MOHALLA, MYSURU CITY - 570 004. &APPELLANT (BY SRI P NATARAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI NARAYANA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, S/O LATE M. NARASIMHA MURTHY, R/AT NO. 417/2, TOTAHATTI ROAD, DEVAMBA AGRAHARA, K.R. MOHALLA, MYSURU CITY - 570 004. 2. SMT. NAGARATHNA AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, D/O. LATE M. NARASIMHA MURTHY, W/O. LATE VENKATARAMAIAH, R/AT NO. 839/13, 3RD CROSS, SUNNADAKERI, K.R. MOHALLA, MYSURU CITY - 570 024. 3. SRI RAMACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, S/O LATE M. NARASIMHA MURTHY, R/AT NO. 53, 16TH CROSS, Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2129 RSA No. 1755 of 2024 I BLOCK, VISHWAPRIYA NAGARA, BEGUR MAIN ROAD, BOMMANAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 068. 4. SMT. ANNAPURNA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, D/O. LATE M. NARASIMHA MURTHY, W/O. M. N. NATARAJ, R/AT NO. 26/9, LAKSHMI NILAYA, 12TH CROSS, V. V. NAGARA, KALLAHALLI, MANDYA -571 401. 5. SMT. GAYATHRIDEVI AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, D/O LATE M. NARASIMHA MURTHY, W/O RAMAIAH, R/AT NO. 554/1, CHELUVAMBA AGRAHARA, K.R. MOHALLA, MYSURU CITY-570 004. 6. SMT. K. NALINI MAJOR, SERICULTURE EXTENSION OFFICER, TECHNICAL SERVICE CENTRE, HARAVE, HARAVE HOBLI, CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT-571 128. &RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.08.2024 PASSED IN RA NO.43/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.01.2023 PASSED IN OS NO.753/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MYSURU. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2129 RSA No. 1755 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for 5th time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE PSG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 79