Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 51080 (KAR)

T.R.ABHILASH GOWDA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/15316/2025 · 2026-01-19

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2738 CRL.P No. 15316 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 15316 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. T.R. ABHILASH GOWDA S/O. T.K. RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 2. T.K. RAJANNA S/O. LATE. KEMPEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS 3. M. HEMAVATHI W/O. T.K. RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, PETITIONERS 1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT NO. 480, 11TH CROSS, RHCS LAYOUT, 1ST STAGE, ANNAPOORNESHWARI NAGAR, NAGARABHAVI 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 091 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIJAYKUMAR PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2738 CRL.P No. 15316 of 2025 REP BY NUGGEHALLI POLICE, NOW REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. MEENAKSHI M D/O, BYRE GOWDA M.N. AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, MULLUKERE VILLAGE, NUGGEHALLI HOBLI, CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 571 442 ALSO AT VIDYANAGAR, HASSAN CITY, HASSAN - 573 202. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP FOR R1; R2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482(FILED U/S.528 BNSS) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLIANT IN CRIME NO.135/2025 DATED 25.09.2025 REGISTERED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT NUGGEHALLI POLICE FOR THE OFFENCE P/US/ 504, 342, 323, 506 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC AND SEC.3, 4 OF DP ACT 1961 NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL CIVIL JUDGE (Jr.Dn.) AND JMFC AT CHANNARAYAPATNA IMPUGNED AT ANNEXURE A AND B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2738 CRL.P No. 15316 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The petitioners herein sought for quashing of FIR. In the meantime, charge sheet was submitted to the concerned Trial Court. 2. In that background, petitioners seek leave to withdraw the above petition, with liberty to file a fresh one for quashing of charge sheet." In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JY List No.: 2 Sl No.: 41