UMMI KABAB NON-VEGIS HOTEL v. SRI RAJITH PUNJA MAJALABETTU BEEDU
CRL.RP/45/2026 · 2026-04-28
V Srishananda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5106 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5106 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23872 CRL.RP No. 45 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.45 OF 2026 (397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS) BETWEEN:
UMMI KABAB NON-VEGIS HOTEL REP, BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI. VIJAY SAGAR SHETTY, S/O SRI.GANESH, UMMI KABAB NON-VEGIS REP, BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI. VIJAY SAGAR SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1369, 24TH MAIN, 24TH CROSS, 2ND STAGE, BSK, BENGALURU-560 085 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARASIMHA MURTHY K, ADVOCATE) AND:
SRI RAJITH PUNJA MAJALABETTU BEEDU S/O BHAVANI SHANKAR PUJNA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.436, 8TH MAIN, 11TH CROSS, SUNDARAM SHETTY NAGAR, BTM 4TH STAGE, BANNERUGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 076. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. OMKAR BASAVA PRABHU, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 09.10.2025 IN CRL.A.NO.1454/2022 PASSED BY THE LXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-63) AT BENGALURU.
Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23872 CRL.RP No. 45 of 2026
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
Demand draft in a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- is tendered by the revision petitioner to the learned counsel for the respondent. Same is acknowledged in the order sheet.
2. Another memo is filed on behalf of the revision petitioner seeking to pay the balance amount in five installments.
Learned counsel for the respondent has endorsed ‘no objection’.
3. Placing the memo on record, revision petition stands
disposed of.
4. The amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant under due identification.
5. It is made clear that, if any one of the installment as agreed in the memo is not paid, revision petitioner shall
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23872 CRL.RP No. 45 of 2026
undergo imprisonment as ordered by the learned Trial Magistrate confirmed by the learned Judge in the First Appellate Court. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
kcm List No.: 2 Sl No.: 33