Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 51057 (KAR)

SRI. NAGARAJ v. THE TAHSILDHAR

WP/33405/2025 · 2026-02-05

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6935 WP No. 33405 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 33405 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SRI. NAGARAJ S/O LAKSHMAN RAO AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, RESIDING AT KARAHALLI VILLAGE, NANDAGUDI HOBLI, NELAVAGILU POST, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 122. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVA MURUGAN V, ADVOCATE) AND: THE TAHSILDHAR KOLAR TALUK KOLAR - 563 101 …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION 05/01/2024, VIDE ANNX-C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6935 WP No. 33405 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for the respondent. 2. It is the contention of the petitioner that his mother Smt.Achamma W/o Lakshman Rao, was conferred occupancy rights in respect of 1 acre 34 guntas in Sy.No.45, 1 acre 16 guntas in Sy.No.68 and 14 guntas in Sy.No.31, all situated at the Chandrashekarapura Village, Vemagal Hobli, Kolar Taluk, Kolar District, at the hands of the Land Tribunal in proceedings bearing LRF No.14/1974-1975 and LRF.1418/1974-75. Therefore, the name of the petitioner should be entered in the revenue records. 3. To a pointed query to the learned counsel for the petitioner as to where is the order of the Land Tribunal, learned counsel submits that the petitioner does not have a copy of the orders passed by the Land Tribunal. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6935 WP No. 33405 of 2025 4. Unless the petitioner is able to produce a copy of the orders said to have been passed by the Land Tribunal, such a request cannot be entertained by the Tahsildar. 5. Consequently, the writ petition stands disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to furnish a certified copy of the order said to have been passed by the Land Tribunal in proceeding bearing No.LRF No.14/1974-1975 and LRF.1418/1974-75 along with a representation to the Tahsildar. If such an application is filed along with the certified copy of the order passed by the Land Tribunal, the Tahsildar may proceed to consider the same in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14