Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:45 WP No. 34011 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 34011 OF 2025 (KLR-REG) BETWEEN:
SMT. MANGAMMA W/O VENKATESHAPPA, D/O LATE. MUNIYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT KALLANDUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 101.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI.A.LOURDU MARIYAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT OFFICE, MULABAGAL ROAD, KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR - 563 101.
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KOLAR SUB-DIVISION, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 101.
Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:45 WP No. 34011 of 2025
4.
THE THASILDAR, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 101.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS, THEREBY TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER AS ON 21-06-2017 TO THE FOURTH RESPONDENT AUTHORITY AS PER ANNEXURE-B AND ANNEXURE-H, REPRESENTATION TO THE FOURTH RESPONDENT AUTHORITY DATED 28-09-2015 ANNEXURE-H TO THE SECOND RESPONDENT AUTHORITY DATED 09-01-2025 ANNEXURE-H-1 AND THIRD RESPONDENT AUTHORITY DATED 09-01-2025 ANNEXURE-H-2 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate Court Government Pleader accepts notice for all the respondents.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that her father's application filed in Form No.53 seeking regularization of
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:45 WP No. 34011 of 2025
unauthorised occupation of land in Sy.No.2 of Bettahalli Village, Vakkaleri Hobli, Kolar Taluk and District to an extent of 1 acre 20 guntas has not been considered till date. The petitioner and her parents had submitted multiple representations to consider her father's application submitted in Form No.53. Therefore, the prayer in the petition is to direct the respondents to consider the representations at Annexures-B, H, H1, H2 and H3 and till consideration, direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petition schedule properties.
3. The writ petition stands disposed of with a specific direction to respondent No.4-Tahsildar, Kolar Taluk, to verify from the records as to whether such application filed by the petitioner's father at Annexure-A dated 30.04.1999 is pending
consideration. If it is found that such application was indeed filed by the petitioner's father and the application is yet to be considered, the Tahsildar is directed to place before the Committee for regularisation of unauthorised occupation, the applications along with his recommendation within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall consider the application and
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:45 WP No. 34011 of 2025
pass necessary orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Ordered accordingly.
Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28