[2026:RJ-JP:15509] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6234/2025 Harvendra @ Kalu Son Of Hanesh Kumar, Resident Of 72 Hanuman Vatika, Kapurawala, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Mukesh Kumawat Son Of Shri Daluram, Sub Inspector Of Police, S.h.o. Police Station Malpura Gate, Sanganer, District Jaipur City East (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Singh Shekhawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP Mr. Alimuddin, I.O., P.S-Malpura Gate, Jaipur East. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 15/04/2026 1- ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g ;kfpdk varxZr /kkjk 528 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds rgr ifjoknh&izR;FkhZ dh vksj ls iqfyl Fkkuk&ekyiqjk xsV] t;iqj 'kgj ¼iwoZ½ esa iathc) djok;h x;h izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&71@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 3] 4] 13 jktLFkku lkoZtfud |wr v/;kns'k rFkk /kkjk 112¼2½] 318¼3½ ch-,u-,l- dks fujLr fd;s tkus gsrq izLrqr dh x;h gSA 2- fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dk fuosnu gS fd ;kph&vfHk;qDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa uketn ugha gS] fdlh O;fDr ds lkFk /kks[kk/kM+h dh gks vFkok vuqfpr gkfu igqapkbZ gks] ,sls O;fDr }kjk dksbZ f'kdk;r ugha dh xbZ gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&vfHk;qDr }kjk bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; S.B. Criminal Mis. Petition No. 3037/2022 Sanjay [2026:RJ-JP:15509] (2 of 4) [CRLMP-6234/2025] Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan & S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 565/2017 Rahul Kumar and Anr. Vs. The State of Rajasthan izLrqr djrs gq, fuosnu fd;k fd oLrqr% vfHk;qDr ds fo:) dksbZ laKs; vijk/k izdV ugha gks jgk gS vkSj var esa mijksDr vk/kkjksa ij ;g izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA 3- fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk ;kfpdk dk fojks/k djrs gq, tkfgj fd;k fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa of.kZr rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij laKs; vijk/k ds rRo izdV gks jgs gSa] mijksDr vkjksiksa vFkok bl ;kfpdk ds ek/;e ls vfHk;qDr }kjk fy, x;s cpko ds laca/k esa vHkh vafre fu"d"kZ ugha fn;k tk ldrk] ;g vuqla/kku@fopkj.k dk fo"k; gS] vUr esa ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA 4- nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksaZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA 5- orZeku izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ds ek/;e ls ;g vkjksi yxk;k gS fd vfHk;qDr }kjk edku Lokeh /kesZUnz ls mldk edku fdjk;k ij ysdj ogka ij voS/k :i ls fcuk vuqKk i= ds tqvk o lV~Vk lapkfyr dj vke O;fDr;ksa ds lkFk /kks[kk/kM+h o vuqfpr gkfu igqapkus dk d`R; fd;k tk jgk Fkk] ;g vijk/k NyiwoZd fxjksg ds :i esa dkfjr fd;s tkus dk vkjksi gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&vfHk;qDr }kjk izLrqr U;kf;d fu.kZ; rF;ksa esa fHkUurk ds dkj.k ls orZeku izdj.k ij ykxw ugha gksrs gSa] ekeyk vHkh rd vuqla/kkuk/khu gSA 6- ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk State of Uttar Pradesh and Anrs. Vs. Akhil Sharda and Ors with Sanjeet Jaiswal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. 2022 SCC OnLine SC 820 ds iSjk la[;k&07 esa ;g O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh x;h gS%& "7. Having gone through the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court by which the High Court has set aside the criminal proceedings in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., it appears that the High Court has virtually conducted a mini trial, which as such is [2026:RJ-JP:15509] (3 of 4) [CRLMP-6234/2025] not permissible at this stage and while deciding the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. As observed and held by this Court in a catena of decisions no mini trial can be conducted by the High Court in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. jurisdiction and at the stage of deciding the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court cannot get into appreciation of evidence of the particular case being considered." 7- blh izdkj ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Kamaladevi Agarwal Vs. State of W.B. & Ors. (2002) 1 SCC 555 ds iSjk la[;k&07 esa ;g O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh x;h gS%& "7. This Court has consistently held that the revisional or inherent powers of quashing the proceedings at the initial stage should be exercised sparingly and only where the allegations made in the complaint or the FIR, even if taken it at the face value and accepted in entirety, do not prima facie discolse the commission of an offence. Disputed and controversial facts cannot be made the basis for the exercise of the jurisdiction." 8- mijksDr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj Li"V gS fd vuqla/kku dh LVst ij izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dks fujLr djkus gsrq vUrfuZfgr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs le; izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa of.kZr vkjksi rFkk vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls fy, x;s cpko o vU; lkexzh dh lR;rk] fo'oluh;rk vkfn ds laca/k esa laf{kIr tkap vFkok laf{kIr fopkj.k vuqKs; ugha gSA orZeku ekeys esa izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa of.kZr rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij laKs; vijk/k ds rRo izdV gks jgs gSaA ;g izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ U;k;ky;hu izfØ;k dk nq:i;ksx djus gsrq ntZ djk;h x;h gks] ,slk Li"V ekeyk ugha gS rFkk yxk;s x;s vkjksi vius vki esa vlaHkkO; gks] ,slh fLFkfr Hkh ugha gSA vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls tks cpko fy;s x;s gSa] os vuqla/kku dk fo"k; gks ldrs gSa rFkk vkjksi i= izLrqr gksus dh fLFkfr eas cpko lk{; ds le; lqlaxr gks ldrs gSaA vfHk;qDr }kjk fy, x;s cpko ek= vk/kkj ij izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dks fujLr fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dks fujLr djus [2026:RJ-JP:15509] (4 of 4) [CRLMP-6234/2025] gsrq vUrfuZfgr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx la;r rjhds ls o iw.kZ lko/kkuh ds lkFk visf{kr gSA lkekU; :i ls tc rd lqn`< vk/kkj ugha gksa] vuqla/kku vFkok fopkj.k dh izfØ;k dks jksdk tkuk vFkok ckf/kr fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA 9- mijksDr foospkukuqlkj izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ fujLr djus gsrq /kkjk 528 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds rgr {ks=kf/kdkfjrk dk iz;ksx gLrxr ekeys esa fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA 10- ifj.kker% ;g ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk LFkxu vkosnu Hkh mDrkuqlkj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DINESH KUMAWAT /04