Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 51043 (KAR)

SMT.LAKSHMIDEVI B L v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/15322/2025 · 2026-01-12

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2442 CRL.P No. 15322 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 15322 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT. LAKSHMIDEVI B. L., AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, WIFE OF CHIDANANDA, RESIDING AT DODDACHELLUR VILLAGE, PARASHURAM HOBLI, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 522. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKAR H. S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY PEENYA POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. SMT. AMBHIKA, WIFE OF HANUMANTHARAYA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. D196, 5TH CROSS, M.S.LAYOUT, NEAR PARLE-G FACTORY, Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2442 CRL.P No. 15322 of 2025 NAGASANDRA, BENGALURU – 560 073. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL. SPP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 (FILED U/S.528 BNSS) CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 19.08.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED XXXI ADDL CJM BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.29105/2018 WHEREBY NOTICE HAS BEEN ISSUED ON THE PROSECUTION’S APPLICATION FILED U/S.319 OF CR.P.C AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Heard Sri.Shankar H.S., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri.B.N.Jagadeesha, learned Addl. SPP appearing for the respondent No.1 and have perused the material on record. 2. The petitioner is before this Court calling in question issuance of notice by order dated 19.08.2025 on an application filed under Section of 319 of Cr.P.C. seeking to bring back the petitioner into the web of trial. Since only notice is issued, it could be that the concerned Court did not allow the drawing of - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2442 CRL.P No. 15322 of 2025 the petitioner back to the web of proceedings. In the event any order is passed, that would be prejudicial to the interest of the petitioner. The petitioner is at liberty to knock at the doors of this Court. With the aforesaid observations, petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE CBC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45 CT:SS