GANESH @ ARJUN S/O SHRI LAXMI NARAYAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5127/2026 · 2026-04-17
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5104 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5104 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:16224] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5127/2026 Ganesh @ Arjun S/o Shri Laxmi Narayan, R/o Harijan Basti, Ladpura, Police Station Kotwali, Kota City, At Present At C-48, Mohanlal Sukhadiya Awasiya Yojana, Police Station Nanta, District Kota City (Raj.) (At Presently Confined In District Jail Kota) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 17/04/2026
1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 80/2026 registered at Police Station Nanta, District Kota City for the offence(s) under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 324(4), 190 & 191(2) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; he is in custody since long. He further submits that charge-sheet is proposed to be filed; there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner. He further submits that injuries sustained by the injured are attributed to Sahil and Gappu; conclusion of trial may take a long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the
[2026:RJ-JP:16224] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5127/2026] petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that petitioner is behind the bars since long; charge-sheet is proposed to be filed; there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Ganesh @ Arjun S/o Shri Laxmi Narayan is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.
(SANGEETA SHARMA),J SHIVANI/47