Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 51022 (KAR)

SMT JAYASHEELA H P v. SMT CHINNAMMA

RSA/1745/2024 · 2026-01-20

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3203 RSA No. 1745 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1745 OF 2024 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. JAYASHEELA H P., AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS W/O LATE SHIVAKUMARASWAMY 2. SRI MAHENDRA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS S/O LATE SHIVAKUMARASWAMY 3. PRATHIBA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS D/O LATE SHIVAKUMARASWAMY APPELLANTS NO.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT CHUNCHANAHALLI VILLAGE, DODDAKOWLANDE HOBLI, NANAJANGUD TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 301. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI P NATARAJU, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SMT. CHINNAMMA AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS D/O DODDMALLAPPA RA/T HANUMANTHAPURA VILLAGE DODDAKOWLANDE HOBLI NANJAGUD TLAUK MYSURU DISTRICT 571 301. 2. SRI GURUSIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3203 RSA No. 1745 of 2024 S/O DODDAMALLAPPA 3. SMT. ERAMMA AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS W/O CHIKKAMADAPPA RESPONDENT NOS.2 & 3 ARE R/A CHUNCHANAHALLI VILLAGE, DODDAKOWLANDE HOBLI, NANJANGUD TALUK, MYSURU DISTRIFCT - 571 301. 4. SMT. RATHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS W/O MARILINAPPA R/AT GATTAVADI VILLAGE DODDAKOWLANDE HOBLI NANJANGUD TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 301. 5. SMT. UMA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS W/O LATE RAJASHEKARA MURTHY R/AT CHUNCHANAHALLI VILLAGE DODDAKOWLANDE HOBLI NANJANGUD TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 301. 6. SMT. MANGALAMMA SINCE DEAD BY LRS SRI B.M. RAMESHA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O LT MAHADEVAPPA 7. SRI B.M. UMASHANKAR AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS S/O LT MAHDEVAPPA 8. SMT. SAVARNAMAM AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS W/O MARISWAMY RESPONDENTS NO.6 TO 8 ARE R/AT BASAVANALU VILLAGE, DODDAKOWLANDE HOBLI, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3203 RSA No. 1745 of 2024 NANJANGUD TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 301. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.08.2024 PASSED IN RA NO.22/2017 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.06.2017 PASSED IN OS NO.431/2011 ON THE FILE OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD. THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for seventh time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 100