Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 51001 (MAD)

Rajeswari v. A. Jeyakumar

CMP(MD)/1616/2026 · 2026-07-14

K Murali Shankar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP(MD) No.1616 of 2026 in CMA(MD)SR.No.102968 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14-07-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR CMP(MD) No.1616 of 2026 in CMA(MD) SR.No.102968 of 2025 1.K.Rajeswari 2.Minor.K.Atchaya 3.Minor.K.Alagu Meenakshi 4.Murugesan (minor petitioners 2 and 3 represented through their Mother / natural guardian viz., Tmt.K.Rajeshwari) Petitioners/ Appellants Vs 1.A.Jeyakumar 2.M/s.National Insurance Co. Ltd., represented by its Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, No.3, North Veli Street, Madurai-625001. Respondents/ Respondents This Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 173(1) of TNMACT Rules praying to condone the delay of 923 days in filing the C.M.A. in M.C.O.P.No.588 of 2019 on the file of the Special District Judge (for MCOP cases), Madurai in order dated 05.01.2023. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) No.1616 of 2026 in CMA(MD)SR.No.102968 of 2025 For Petitioners: Mr.A.Theethar, Advocate For Respondents: No appearance for R1 Mr.V.Sakthivel, Advocate for R2 ORDER The above petition has been filed seeking orders to condone the delay of 923 days in filing the appeal, challenging the award dated 05.01.2023 passed in M.C.O.P.No.588 of 2019 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Special District Court to deal with MCOP cases, Madurai. 2. No representation for the first respondent. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the second respondent would submit that if the petitioners are waiving interest for those delay periods, they are having no objections to condone the delay and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would also agree for the same. 6. Considering the above, this Court is inclined to condone the delay. Accordingly, this petition is ordered and the Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. The petitioners / claimants are not entitled to interest for the delayed period. 14-07-2026 CSM To The Special District Judge dealing with MCOP cases, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Madurai. 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis