Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50995 (KAR)

SHRI. UDAYASHANKAR. K v. SMT. Y. P. ASHA

WP/34090/2024 · 2026-01-22

S R Krishna Kumar

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3662 WP No. 34090 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 34090 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI. UDAYASHANKAR. K S/O LATE KRISHNAPA S AGED 45 YEARS R/O NO. 332, FLAT NO. 301 ARCHITA, 18TH CROSS, IDEAL HOMES COLONY RAJARAJESHARINAGAR BANGALORE 98 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. P.G.YATNAL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. Y. P. ASHA W/O B S VENKATESH AGED 45 YEARS R/AT K. T-380, 1ST CROSS MARIGOWDA EXTENSION MANDYA CITY - 571 410. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3662 WP No. 34090 of 2024 2. SRI NANDANKUMAR SURVEYOR AGED 45 YEARS R/AT LAND RECORDS DIRECTOR OFFICE TALUK OFFICE MALAVALLI TALUK MANDYA DIST - 571 430. 3. THE TAHASILDAR MALAVALLI, MALAVALLI TALUK MANDYA DIST - 571 430. 4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS MALAVALLI TALUK MANDYA DIST - 571 430 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.H.S.SHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD. 22.10.2024 IS HEREBY PRODUCED AS ANNX-C PASSED BY THE HONBLE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE (Jr. Dvn) AND JMFC, MALAVALLI IN O.S.NO. 371/2018 ALLOWING I.A.NO.05 UNDER 94(e) R/W 151 OF CPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3662 WP No. 34090 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the present petition to file an appropriate Miscellaneous Appeal before the jurisdictional Appellate Court. 2. Memo is placed on record. 3. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to file an appeal before the appropriate Appellate Court against the impugned order. If such an appeal is preferred by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner would be entitled to the benefit of exclusion of time/limitation under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. 4. Subject to the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE VM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5