Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50993 (MAD)

Chandran v. K.J. Praveenkumar I.A.S.,

CONT P(MD)/1880/2026 · 2026-07-07

C V Karthikeyan, R Sakthivel

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont.P(MD)No.1880 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.07.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL Cont.P.(MD)No.1880 of 2026 1. Chandran S/o. Andi, 212, North Street, Manalmettupatti, Chokkalingapuram, Melur Taluk, Madurai District -625103. ... Petitioner(s) in CONT P(MD). 1880/ 2026 - Vs. - 1. K.J. Praveenkumar I.A.S., The District Collector, Collectorate, Madurai, Madurai District. 2. Sangeetha The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. the Revenue Divisional Officer, Vellaripatti, Melur, Madurai District. 3. Muthupandi The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk Office, Melur, Madurai District. 4. Mohanram The Block Development Officer, O/o.The Block Development Officer, Kottampatti Panchayat Union, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P(MD)No.1880 of 2026 Kottampatti, Madurai District. 5. Anuratha The Village Administrative Officer, O/o.The Village Administrative Officer, Chokkalingapuram, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. 6. Senthil The Secretry Chokkalingapuram Panchayat Office, Chokkalingapuram, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondent(s) in CONT P(MD). 1880/ 2026 Prayer in CONT P(MD). 1880/ 2026 :Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to initiate contempt proceedings against the Respondent Nos. 1 to 6/Contemnors herein for their wilful disobedience to the order passed by this Court in WP(MD) No. 25784 of 2025 dated 12.11.2025 and punish them accordingly. For Petitioner : M/s.A.Abdul Kabur For Respondents : Mr.M.P.Senthil Counsel for State ORDER (Order of the Court was made by C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.) It is seen that as per the direction of this court, notice under Section 7 of the Land Encroachment Act, 1905 had been issued and subsequently notice under Section 6 of the said Act had also been issued. Since the process had commenced, it may not be proper on the part of this court to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P(MD)No.1880 of 2026 hold the respondent as being contempt of court directions. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed. (C.V.K.,J.) (R.S.V,J.) 07.07.2026 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No RR https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P(MD)No.1880 of 2026 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J AND R.SAKTHIVEL, J RR Cont.P.(MD)No.1880 of 2026 07.07.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis