Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6729-DB R.F.A. No.2726/2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.2726/2024 (SP)
BETWEEN:
K.P. SEETHALAKSHMI W/O C. CHANDRU AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/O. 9TH CROSS, KARAANJIKATTE KOLAR CITY TALUK AND DISTRIC 563101.
…APPELLANT (BY SRI. BHARATHGOWDA B.R. ADV.,)
AND:
1.
SRI. C. PRIYA W/O LATE VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS.
2.
SRI. BALAJI S/O LATE VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS.
RESPONDENTS NO.1 & 2 ARE R/O NO.1537, 9TH CROSS NEAR SRIRAMA TEMPLE MUNESHWARA NAGAR KOLAR CITY, TALUK AND DISTRICT.
Digitally signed by ARSHIFA BAHAR KHANAM HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6729-DB R.F.A. No.2726/2024
3.
SMT. PUSHPAVATHI D/O LATE VENKATESH W/O RAJKUMAR AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/O KODURU VILLAGE, ARALERI POST NEAR MARIYAMMA TEMPLE MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT.
4.
SMT. MALATHI D/O LATE VENKATESH W/O NAVEEN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/O NEAR DHARMARAYA SWAMY TEMPLE 2ND CROSS, VIJAYAPURA TOWN DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., 1980, PRAYING TO CALL FOR ENTIRE RECORDS IN O.S.NO.49/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AT KOLAR. ALLOW THE APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AT KOLAR IN O.S.NO.49/2022 DATED 05.09.2024 & ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6729-DB R.F.A. No.2726/2024
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL)
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 03.01.2026 seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal as the matter is settled in the Lok-adalath. He also submits that he has also filed a memo for refund of Court fee.
2. We have perused both the memos.
3. Memo for withdrawal reads as under:
"The Appellant above named most respectfully submits as follows:
1. That the Appellant has filed the present Regular First Appeal before the High Court of Karnataka.
2. That upon reconsideration of the matter and the matter is settled in lok adalath, the Appellant does not wish to prosecute the above Regular First Appeal any further.
3. That the Appellant therefore seeks permission of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the above Regular First Appeal as not pressed.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6729-DB R.F.A. No.2726/2024
4. That the withdrawal is voluntary and without any coercion, and the Appellant undertakes to be bound by the consequences of such withdrawal.
5. The Appellant respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the Appellant to withdraw the above Regular First Appeal and pass such other order(s) as deemed fit in the interest of justice and equity.
Wherefore, the Appellant humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit withdrawal of the above RFA."
4. Memos are placed on record.
5. In view of the aforesaid memo, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Registry shall refund the eligible Court fee to the appellant, on proper identification.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE
BSR/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28