2026:HHC:12843 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 5372 of 2026 Decided on: 22.04.2026 Pawan Kumar … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ___________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. : Notice not issued to respondent No. 3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice confined to respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2. In light of the issue raised in the present petition, the same is disposed of with the direction that the petitioner may file a representation for his adjustment at some other nearby station within a week from today and endeavour shall be made by the Authority to adjust him there, if possible, in light of the fact that the petitioner is a physically disabled person. Till the decision on the representation, the petitioner shall not be forced to join the station 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:12843 to which stands transferred in terms of the impugned transfer order and he may avail the kind of leave due to him. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge April 22, 2026 (narender)