- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5168 CRL.P No. 13259 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13259 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. RAGHAVENDRA SHETTY, S/O LATE CHANDRASINGHA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/A KARJE POST, HOSOOR CHERKADI, UDUPI - 576 215. 2. SANJEEVI SHETTY W/O LATE CHANDRASINGHA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/A KARJE POST, HOSOOR CHERKADI, UDUPI - 576 215. 3. SUBRAMANYA SHETTY S/O LATE CHANDRASINGHA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/A KARJE POST, HOSOOR CHERKADI, UDUPI - 576 215. 4. SMT. NAGASHREE D/O LATE CHANDRASINGHA SHETTY W/O VASANTHA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/A KARJE POST, HOSOOR CHERKADI, UDUPI - 576 215. Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5168 CRL.P No. 13259 of 2024 5. SUBHASH SHETTY S/O LATE CHANDRASINGHA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/A KARJE POST, HOSOOR CHERKADI, UDUPI - 576 215. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRIKANTH N.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY HEBRI POLICE STATION KARKALA CIRCLE/SUB DIVISION REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLICF PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. SMT. ASHWINI SHETTY W/O AGHAVENDRA SHETTY D/O LATE VITTALA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS R/A 4-74, BADAMANE MANDADI JADDU, CHARA POST AND VILLAGE HEBRI TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. K. PRASANNA SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO ALLOW THE MEMORANDUM OF CRL.P BY QUASHING THE CHARGE SHEET IN CC.NO.1060/2024 (CR.NO.33/2024) ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5168 CRL.P No. 13259 of 2024 AND JMFC, KARKALA INITIATED AGAINST THE PETITIONERS BASED ON THE COMPLAINT FILED BY 2ND RESPONDENT, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 498(A), 504, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC, SEC.3 AND 4 OF DP ACT, 1961. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL OF PETITION The counsel appearing for the petitioners humbly submits that as per the instructions obtained by the petitioners are seeking leave of this Hon'ble court to withdraw the above petition. Since the petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 have filed mutual consent petition under section 13B of Hindu marriage act in MC No. 246/2025 on the file of Principal family judge, Udupi. The family court at Udupi vide order dated: 12.12.2025 have allowed the petition filed by 1st petitioner and 2nd respondent. Moreover the 2nd respondent clearly admit in her affidavit evidence and in examination chief filed in MC No. 246/2025 stating that complaint lodged under section 498A, 504, 506 R/w 34 of IPC and section 3 and 4 of DP act are Bonafide mistake as the contents of complaint are not true against the petitioners herein. Hence the same may kindly be taken on record in the interest of justice." - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5168 CRL.P No. 13259 of 2024 In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42 CT:BHK