BHARAT SINGH S/O RAGHUVAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3707/2026 · 2026-03-18
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5093 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5093 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11534] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3707/2026 Bharat Singh S/o Raghuvar Singh, R/o Gangoli Police Station Basai Daang District Dholpur. (Presently Accused Petitioner In Judicial Custody In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dhananajay Jain Mr. Sumit Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 18/03/2026
1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 22/2020 registered at Police Station Basai Dang, District Dholpur for offence(s) under Section 216A IPC, Sections 3, 25 Arms Act and Section 11 of Rajasthan Dacoity Affected Areas Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present matter pertains to bail jump. After getting benefit of bail, the petitioner went out of State for earning livelihood, therefore, he could not appear before the learned Trial Court on the concerned date and as such, on 21.03.2022, his bail bonds were forfeited.
Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 25.02.2026. Learned counsel also undertakes that the petitioner shall appear before the learned Trial Court on each and every date as fixed by the Court and the petitioner shall not
[2026:RJ-JP:11534] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3707/2026] make any attempt to jump the bail again, therefore, in the interest of justice, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.
4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; as also the undertaking of the learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date as fixed by the learned Trial Court. Hence, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and accused-petitioner Bharat Singh S/o Raghuvar Singh is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station.
7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
[2026:RJ-JP:11534] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3707/2026]
8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.
(SANGEETA SHARMA),J SHIVANI/94