Udhayakumar v. The State represented by the Inspector of Police
CRL OP/18841/2026 · 2026-07-17
G K Ilanthiraiyan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 50902 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 50902 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 18841 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP No. 18841 of 2026 Udhayakumar ..Petitioner Vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police R7 K K Nagar Police Station, Chennai. Crime No.265/2026 ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused on bail in Crime No.265 of 2026 on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner: Mr.Sivaraman For Respondent: Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.06.2026 for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 74, 75 and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, read with Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act in Crime No.265 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 18841 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had used obscene and vulgar language and had committed acts amounting to outraging the de facto complainant’s modesty. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the Petitioner. 4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the Respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has been incarcerated since 27.06.2026. Hence, he opposed the grant of bail to the Petitioner. 5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case; taking note of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side); considering the period of incarceration of the petitioner, this Court is of the firm view that https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 18841 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 further incarceration of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions. 7.
Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Saidapet, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for the period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 18841 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 17-07-2026 NSL Note:
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To:
1. The XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court Saidapet
2.
The Inspector of Police R7 K K Nagar Police Station, Chennai. 3. The Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai
4. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 18841 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. NSL CRL OP No. 18841 of 2026 17-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis