Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 509 (ORI)

TRUPTIMAYEE KAR v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/2231/2026 · 2026-02-12

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 2231 of 2026 Truptimayee Kar ..... Petitioner Mr. D.K. Sahu, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 12.02.2026 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court would be graciously pleased to admit this writ petition with issue a rule NISI calling upon the Opposite parties to file show cause or show insufficient cause as to why the opposite party No-1 and 2 shall not be directed to regularized the petitioner's post of Pharmacist within a stipulated period. If the Opposite parties fail to file any show cause or show insufficient cause this Hon'ble Court would be pleased to make absolute the said rule and issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or writs directing the Opposite parties to regularized the petitioner's post of Pharmacist within a stipulated period. And further be pleased to pass such other order/orders, direction/directions deem (s) fit and proper in the interest of justice so as to give complete relief to the Page 2 of 2. petitioners and for which act of kindness the petitioners are duty bound to shall ever pray. ” 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No. 2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of her claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 2 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Jyoti