Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5089 (JHR)

AMIT KUMAR ALIAS AMIT VERMA ALIAS AMIT KUMAR VERMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2928/2026 · 2026-04-10

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:10529 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2928 of 2026 ------ Amit Kumar @ Amit Verma @ Amit Kumar Verma aged about 26 years Son of Chotu Prasad Verma, resident of Village Jorasankh P.O. Jaruadih, P.S. Jamua District- Giridih. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Someshwar Roy, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 10-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jamua, P.S. Case No.03 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 109, 111(3), 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder of the informant- Santosh Kumar Vishwakarma. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that allegation against Ramu Saw is firing upon the informant while the allegation against the co-accused Vijay Saw, Karu Yadav and Sanjay Mandal are that they fired 5-6 rounds in air, but there is no allegation against the petitioner of bringing out the pistol or firing. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 22.01.2026 as mentioned in para-10 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Giridih in connection with Jamua, P.S. Case No.03 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 10/04/2026 Amar/