Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50877 (MAD)

A.C.Arun, v. The Commissioner,

WP/14336/2026 · 2026-07-13

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 14336 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 14336 of 2026 A.C.Arun, S/o.Mr.A.Chakravarthi, No.9/5,Venu Street,Patel Nagar, West Tambaram,Chennai 600045 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Commissioner, Tambaram City Municipal Corporation, No.28,Muthurangam Street, West Tambaram,Chennai 600 045 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to pay fair compensation and damages to the Petitioner for the illegal excavation carried out in Petitioner property in Survey No.6/2A to an extent of about 40 feet by 274 feet, without notice or authority of law and further restore the excavated portion back to its original portion by refiling the earth removed forthwith by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 22.09.2025. __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 14336 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.S.Anandan For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Srinivas ORDER The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 22.09.2025. 2. The petitioner states that his father settled 29 cents of Nanja land in his favour under a Settlement Deed dated 18.08.2021. While the petitioner was carrying on seasonal cultivation, the respondent allegedly entered the property without notice or consent and excavated a portion of the petitioner's patta land for the construction of a storm water drainage canal. The petitioner contends that the excavation has obstructed access to his land, despite there being no necessity for the drainage, as an existing storm water drain on the opposite side of the road remains unused. The petitioner further submits that his representation dated 22.09.2025 seeking removal of the encroachment and payment of compensation has not been considered. Challenging the inaction on the part of the respondent, the petitioner has approached this Court. __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 14336 of 2026 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made on either side, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, directs the respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 22.09.2025 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law. Such orders shall be passed within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after issuing notice to the petitioner and affording him an opportunity of a personal hearing. 5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 13-07-2026 Asi __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 14336 of 2026 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. Asi To The Commissioner, Tambaram City Municipal Corporation, No.28,Muthurangam Street, West Tambaram,Chennai 600 045 WP No. 14336 of 2026 13-07-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis