Malleswaran v. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/17878/2026 · 2026-07-10
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 50873 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 50873 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 17878 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 17878 of 2026 Malleswaran S/o. Mani, No.2/540, A2, Ambal Nagar, malumichampatti, Coimbatore-641 021. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by The Inspector of Police K.G.Chavadi Police Station, Coimbatore. Crime No. 115 of 2026. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS, praying to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in the even of his arrest by the respondent Police pending investigation in Crime No.115 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police and thus render Justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.H.Sathya Narayanan For Respondent(s): Mr.N.Palanivel Government Advocate (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 17878 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offences under Sections 8(c) read with 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act in Crime No.115 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found to be in illegal possession of 1 Kg and 300 gams of ganja. Hence the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and a false case has been foisted against the petitioner and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide any any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail.
4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering that the allegations are serious in nature and since the case arises under the NDPS Act, the grant of anticipatory bail would shock the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 17878 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 conscience of the society. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 10-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No MFA To
1. The Inspector of Police K.G.Chavadi Police Station, Coimbatore.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 17878 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. MFA CRL OP No. 17878 of 2026 10-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis