SMT MARIDEVI v. KARIGOWDA SINCE DEAD BY LRS SMT. KARAGAMMA
RSA/1725/2024 · 2026-01-06
Ravi V Hosmani
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 50864 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 50864 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:338 RSA No. 1725 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1725 OF 2024 (PAR/POS) BETWEEN:
1. SMT MARIDEVI W/O SRI. PAPEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT GOPALAPURA VILLAGE, YELAWALA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571130. 2. SMT. PUTTI W/O LATE LINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT HUYIALU VILLAGE, YELAWALA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 130. 3. SMT. LAKSHMI W/O VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS RESIDING AT YASHWANTHPURA, BENGALURU DISTRICT - 560 022. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. CHANNAPPA KENCHANNA, ADVOCATE) AND: KARIGOWDA Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:338 RSA No. 1725 of 2024 SINCE DEAD BY LRS
1. SMT. KARAGAMMA W/O LATE KARIGOWDA MAJOR,
2. SMT. KARAGAMMA W/O LATE DASEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
3. SRI. BASAVA S/O LATE DASEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
4. SRI. BETE S/O LATE DASEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
5. SRI. DASEGOWDA S/O LATE DASEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
6. SMT. GEETHA W/O LATE DASEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
7. SRI. CHIKKEGOWDA S/O KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
8. SRI. BETTEGOWDA S/O KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
9. SRI. THIMMEGOWDA
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:338 RSA No. 1725 of 2024 S/O KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
10. SRI. KARIGOWDA S/O KARIGOWDA MAJOR THE RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 10 ARE RESIDING AT HUYILALU VILLAGE, YELAWALA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 130. 11. SMT. DODDAMMA W/O PUTTEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT KAMANAKOPPALU VILLAGE, YELAWALA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 130. 12. SMT. M B MAHADEVAMMA D/O M P BASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 330, 21st MAIN 2nd STAGE, J P NAGAR MYSURU - 570 008. 13. SMT. JAYAMMA W/O CHIKKEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
14. SRI. RAGHU S/O CHIKKEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
15. SRI. RAVI
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:338 RSA No. 1725 of 2024 S/O CHIKKEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
16. SMT. RATHNAMMA D/O CHIKKEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
17. SRI. PUTTALAKSHMI D/O CHIKKEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
18. SMT MAHADEVAMMA W/O BETTEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
19. SRI VIJI S/O BETTEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
20. SRI SATHISH S/O BETTEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
21.
SMT PUTTAMMA W/O THIMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
22. SRI PUTTAMMA D/O THIMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
23. SRI. MAHESH S/O THIMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:338 RSA No. 1725 of 2024
24. SMT MANAGALA W/O KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
25. SMT. RATHANAMMA D/O KARIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
26. SRI. MAHESH S/O KARIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS
27. SMT. LAKSHMI D/O KARIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS,
28. SRI. SANNAPPA, S/O SRI. KARIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS THE RESPONDENTS NO. 16 TO 28 ARE RESIDING AT HUYILALU VILLAGE, YELAWALA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 130. 29. THE CITIZEN WELFARE HBCS LTD., REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1956, BEARING REGISTRATION NO.DRM R.G.N.C/334876/2006-07, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.218/K-30, GROUND FLOOR, NEAR SHANTHALA THEATRE, NARAYANA SHASTRY ROAD, MYSURU - 570 004, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETORY. …RESPONDENTS
- 6 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:338 RSA No. 1725 of 2024
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 8.02.2021 PASSED IN RA NO.115/2018 ON THE FILE OF PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU., DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.03.2018 PASSED IN OS NO.96/2010 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MYSURU. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellants submits that matter is settled between parties out of Court, and therefore, Appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.
2. Noting submission of learned counsel for appellants, Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 147