Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50858 (MAD)

M.U.ANISUR RAHMAN v. CAN FIN HOMES LIMITED

WP/26416/2026 · 2026-07-16

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.26416 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16.07.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.26416 of 2026 M.U.Anisur Rahman S/o.Mohammed Usman 612/9, II Street, Millath Nagar Jagir Ammapalayam Salem-636 302 Petitioner Vs Can Fin Homes Limited Rep by its Authorised Officer Salem Branch D.No.1, 1st Floor, Johnsonpet Road, Hastampatti, Salem -636 007 Respondent PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the Debt Recovery Tribunal at Coimbatore to dispose S.A.No.110/2026 within time as fixed by this Hon’ble Court. For Petitioner: Mr.P.Murali ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.26416 of 2026 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks a direction in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore to dispose of S.A.No.110 of 2026, within a time frame fixed by this Court. 2. Admittedly, the SA is of the year 2026. The petitioner himself stated in the petition that SA is posted on 7.8.2026. Any direction to expedite a specific case out of turn would disrupt the board of the Tribunal. The petitioner has failed to demonstrate any exceptional circumstance that distinguishes his case from other litigants waiting in queue before the Tribunal. The Tribunal should prioritize cases based on their seniority, nature of urgency and statutory mandate. It is empowered to regulate its procedure and accelerate hearings if a genuine case of urgency is made out. Issuing blanket direction for quick disposal would put undue pressure on the Tribunal and, consequently, the persons who approached the Tribunal earlier would be left at a disadvantaged position. ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.26416 of 2026 3. We are, therefore, not inclined to give such a direction to decide the case within a time frame. However, in the event of any extreme urgency, the petitioner would get liberty to file appropriate application before the Tribunal to expedite the hearing. With this liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 16.07.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr To: The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore. ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.26416 of 2026 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN, J. bbr W.P.No.26416 of 2026 16.07.2026 ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis