APPIKONDA UMA MAHESWARA RAO, VIZIANAGARAM DT. & 3 OTHRS v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, REP. BY P.P. & ANR
CRLRC/236/2015 · 2026-07-12
Sunitha Gandham
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5084 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5084 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date of reserved for orders : - Date of pronouncement :13.07.2026 Date of uploading : 13.07.2026 APHC010749112015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] MONDAY, THE 13th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 236/2015 Between:
1. APPIKONDA UMA MAHESWARA RAO, VIZIANAGARAM DT. & 3 OTHRS, AGED ABOUT 43YEARS, S/O.A.VENKAT NAIDU, OM:
SENIOR OFFICE ASSISTANT, MARGADARSI CHIT FUND RIO.
HOUSE NO.52, PYDIMAMABA RESIDEINCY, NEAR VIDYA TECHNO SCHOOL, K.L. PURAM VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
2. APPIKONDA SATYANARAYANA MURTHY@ SATISH KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O. A VENKAT NAIDU, RESIDING AT SIDDHARTHNAGAR, NIT POST, KAZIPET, WARANGAL DISTRICT.
3. APPIKONDA PADMAVATHI DEVI, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, W/O. BUDITI GOPI, KAMANDORAVALASA VILLAGE POST, SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
4. APPIKONDA BHAVANI DEVI, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, W/O. S.
MURALI KRISHNA, H.NO. 1202, SECTOR-15 KALOMBOLI, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. STATION HOUSE OFFICER REP BY P P ANR, PENDURTHY P.S., VISAKHAPATNAM, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TEIANGANA AND STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
2. MRS A PRIYANKA NAIDU, W/O. A UMA MAHESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O. NEAR SAIBABA TEMPLE, LESIDES SHANKAR FOUNDATION, SAI MADHAVA NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. N ASHWANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2. M LAXMAN RAO The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.236 OF 2015
ORDER:
This Criminal Revision Case is filed challenging the orders dated 09.12.2024 passed by the learned I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam in Crl.M.P. No.2757 of 2013 in C.C. No.48 of 2013.
2. Sri A.Ravi Kiran, learned counsel representing Sri N.Ashwani Kumar,
learned counsel for the revision petitioners submitted that the main case in C.C. No.48 of 2013 has already been disposed of vide judgment dated
08.09.2015.
3. Recorded the said submission. This Criminal Revision case is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J
13.07.2026 knl
Whether the order is : ✓ Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No ✓ Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No