Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5083 (GAU)

HDFC GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. MD RAMJAN ALI @ MAR RAMAJAN ALI AND 2 ORS.

I.A.(Civil)/78/2026 · 2026-02-26

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010005032026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/78/2026 HDFC GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AND HEAD OFFICE AT RAMON HOUSE, H.T. PAREKH MARG, 169, BACKBAY RECLAMATION, MUMBAI- 400020 AND ITS GUWAHATI BRANCH OFFICE AT ADITYAM BUILDING, 6TH FLOOR, LACHIT NAGAR, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI, ASSAM- 781007. VERSUS MD RAMJAN ALI @ MAR RAMAJAN ALI AND 2 ORS. S/O SHUKUR ALI, R/O VILL- TAMULDI, P.O.- CHAMPUPARA BAZAR, P.S.- BOKO, DIST- KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN- 781123. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R GOSWAMI, MS. P BORTHAKUR,MS. M SAIKIA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A BHATTACHARYYA(R1), MR. N R AHMED(R1) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 27.02.2026 Heard Ms. M. Saikia, learned counsel for the applicant. As per Office Note dated 24.02.2026, advocates have entered appearance on behalf of respondent No. 1 by filing Vakalatnama and names Page No.# 2/2 are also reflected in the Cause List, but none appears on call. This is an application for condonation of delay of 15 days in preferring the connected appeal. Having regard to the averments made in the instant application, with regard to the cause of delay supported an affidavit, I am of the view that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from referring the appeal within the period of limitation. Accordingly, the delay stands condoned. I.A. stands disposed of. Registry to register the connected appeal. List accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant