Kadasani Rangeshwara Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/17359/2026 · 2026-07-02
Subba Reddy Satti
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5082 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5082 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date of reserved for orders : --- Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010331392026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 17359/2026 Between:
1. KADASANI RANGESHWARA REDDY, S/O CHINNA MALLA REDDY AGED ABOUT 45YRS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O H.N0.28/5-H5-2-A, K.C. ROAD POLICE COLONY, NOONEPALLI NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR - 522237
2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT -518004
3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT K.C. CANAL DIVISION NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT - 518501
4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT K.C. CANAL DIVISION ALLAGADDA, NANDYAL DISTRICT - 518543
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in trying to lay
the road through the land of the petitioner situated in Sy.No.38-2P1 of Jangalapalle village, Peddamudium mandal, YSR Kadapa District without following due process of law and without initiating the Land Acquisition proceedings as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the A.P. Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2018 and in violation of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to lay the road through the land of the petitioner situated in Sy.No.38-2P1 of Jangalapalle village, Peddamudium Mandal, YSR Kadapa District without following due process of law in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to lay the road through the land of the petitioner situated in Sy.No.38-2P1 of Jangalapalle village, Peddamudium mandal, YSR Kadapa District without following due process of law pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR IRRI AND CAD The Court made the following order:
Heard Sri V. Sai Sri Harsha, learned counsel representing Sri P. Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Satish, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Irrigation and CAD, for the respondents. 2. The above writ petition was filed to declare the action of respondents 2 to 4 in attempting to lay a road through the petitioner’s land situated in Survey No.38-2P1 of Jangalapalle village, Peddamudium Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, without following the due process of law, as illegal and arbitrary. Page 3 of 4
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the absolute owner of Ac.3.1850 cents situated in the aforementioned survey number. A copy of the adangal report, downloaded from the ‘Mee Bhoomi’ portal on 28.06.2026, was filed as Ex.P1. As seen from Ex.P1, the petitioner’s name is reflected as Pattadar and possessor of the land referred to supra, and the same is ancestral property. 4. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Irrigation and CAD submitted the instructions furnished by respondent No.3 vide letter No.EE/KCC/DIVN/NDL/, wherein it is stated that the respondents are not laying any road in or near the petitioner’s land in Survey No.38-2P1 of Jangalapalle village, Peddamudium Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. 5. The instructions of respondent No.3 are made part of the record. 6. Given the instructions of respondent No.3, since no road is being laid in or near the subject land, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage with the consent of learned counsel on either side, directing respondents 2 to 4 not to interfere with the petitioner’s land without following the procedure. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 03.07.2026 IKN
Whether the order is :
Speaking Yes/No / Recorded Yes/No
Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 17359 of 2026
Date: 03.07.2026 IKN