CRL OP No. 17362 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 17362 of 2026 1. Manikandan, S/o Muthuraman, No.44/67, 9th Street, Annai Sivagami Nagar, Ennore, Chennai. 2. Vinothkumar @ Brain S/o Ananthan, No.20-A, 6th Street, Annai Sivagami Nagar, Ennore, Chennai. 3. Vadivel S/o Asaithambi, No.20, 5th Street, A.S.Nagar, Thiruvottiyur, Kattivakkam, Tirvallur, Tamil Nadu – 57. 4. Moorthi S/o Sevu, No.63/52, 9th Street, Annai Sivagami Nagar, Ennore, Kattivakkam, Tiruvallur, Tamil Nadu – 57. 5. Madhavan S/o Ganesan, No.63, 7th Street, Annai Sivagami Nagar, Ennore, Ennore Thermal Station, Thiruvallur, Tamil Nadu – 57. ..Petitioner(s) Vs https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17362 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 1. The State Rep, By, The Inspector of Police M5, Ennore Police Station, Madhavarm, Chennai – 57. Crime No.610 of 2022 2. Ragul S/o Veeraragavan, No.8/A, 2nd Street, Periya Kasi Kovil Kuppam, Ennore, Chennai – 57. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS / 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records of the proceedings in Crime No.610 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Shakthivel For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran Government Counsel (Crl. Side) for R1 ORDER This Criminal Original Petition seeks to quash Crime No.610 of 2022 on the file of the M-5, Ennore Police Station for alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 307 & 506(2) of IPC, on the ground of compromise between the parties. The parties are present before the court and, on examination, stand by their compromise and do not want the case to proceed further. 2. The broad contours of the High Court's power to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.p.c. and Section 528 of the BNSS in https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17362 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 respect of compromise of non-compoundable offences are laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh -Vs- State of Punjab and Another (2012 10 SCC 303) and other subsequent judgments. 3. The gist of facts leading to the instant case are that the petitioners / Accused 1 to 5 entered into quarrel with the de facto complainant and their friends while eating at a road side shop. The quarrel escalated to fight and the accused caused serious injuries to the de facto complainant and his friends. 4. Thus, it can be seen that this matter is a fit case for the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction to quash the case on compromise. 5. Accordingly, this Crl.O.P. No.17362 of 2026 stands allowed. The Crime No.610 of 2022 on the file of the 1st respondent Police stands quashed. 07-07-2026 Neutral Citation: No KKN https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17362 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. KKN To 1. The Inspector of Police M5, Ennore Police Station, Madhavarm, Chennai – 57. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. CRL OP No. 17362 of 2026 07-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis