W.P.(C) 13/2026 $~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 13/2026 with CM APPL. 28/2026 and CM APPL. 29/2026 RAJA BABU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Om Srivastava, Advocate. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advocate for R- 1/MCD. Mr. Himanshu Kaushik, Mr. Rupender Sharma and Mr. Aaransh Pathak, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Saifi Ahmad, Advocate for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 05.01.2026 1. Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.1/MCD submits that there is a mismatch between the photographs filed with the petition as well as the complaints which are annexed with the petition. He submits that the complaints refer to property no. E-112, Shaheen Bagh, Okhla, whereas the photographs are in respect of House No. E-192. 2. Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.3 on advance notice submits that respondent no.3 is the owner and occupier of property No.E- 192 and not E-112. 3. Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/01/2026 at 12:19:30 W.P.(C) 13/2026 liberty to take steps in accordance with law. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 5. All pending applications stand disposed of. AMIT BANSAL, J JANUARY 5, 2026 Vivek/- This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/01/2026 at 12:19:30