Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35570 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Kuldeep Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 and Sri R.K.Shukla, learned counsel for respondent no. 2 and perused the record.
2. The only prayer has been made by learned counsel for the petitioner to direct the respondent no. 2, namely the Branch Manager, H.D.F.C. Bank, to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 29.08.2026, copy whereof has been brought on record as Annexure 3 to the writ petition.
3. The aforesaid prayer has not been opposed by Sri Shukla, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.
4. In this view of the matter and in the interest of justice, the respondent no. 2 is directed to pass appropriate orders on the aforesaid representation taking into consideration the law laid down in the case of Ashish Rawat Vs. Union of India and others (Writ-C No. 1489 of 2026, decided on 08.4.2026) and Khalsa Medical Store Thru. Prop. Yashwant Singh Vs. Reserve Bank of India Thru. Governor and 3 others (Writ-C No. 12211 of 2025, decided on 19th January, 2026).
5. The writ petition is disposed of. September 9, 2026 Pratima Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Kuldeep Kumar (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Sumit Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad