2026:JHHC:1437 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No.5954 of 2025 Mohan Kumar, aged about 35 years, son of late Jagan Ganjhu residents of village Semarsot Kusmahi, P.O & PS Balumath, District – Latehar, Jharkhand …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Prashant Kr. Rahul, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ruby Pandey, APP For the Informant : Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate ------ 2/20.01.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Balumath P.S. Case No.61 of 2025, registered for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 of IPC, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the case is arising out of complaint case, which has been converted into FIR pursuant to the order under section 156 of the CrPC. He next submits that the alleged misappropriation is said to be between 24/8/2016 to 23/6/2017. The complaint was filed on 30th January 2023, after the delay of seven years without explaining the delay and the FIR has been registered in the year 2025. He next submits that however the compromise has taken place between the complainant and the petitioner and that has come in the order of the learned Session Judge, however the learned Session Judge considering that the case is not compoundable, rejected the prayer of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the state submits that the 2026:JHHC:1437 2 allegations are there of cheating against the petitioner. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the informant/complainant accepts the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and submits that the compromise has taken place and pursuant to that, 60 decimals of land has been transferred by the petitioner in favour of the complainant. 6. Considering that the compromise has taken place and the learned counsel appearing for the complainant/informant has stated that 60 decimals of land has been transferred in favour of the informant. 7. In that view of the matter, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within two weeks and the learned court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or sureties, the learned Court may deem fit and proper. 8. This Anticipatory Bail Application is accordingly disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 20.01.2026 R.Kumar